Two discarded and largely undiscussed theories about Jill Dando’s Murder

Neither of these are going to please either the conspiracy theorists, or those diehards insisting that they have seen (or been told about) dozens of items of undisclosed evidence offering cast-iron proof that Barry George really was guilty and his supporters deluded or wicked.

However, Medawar has taken and interest in the case from when he first heard about Jill Dando’s murder, on the Easter Monday in 1999 when it happened, right up today. In all that time, they are the only two theories that Medawar has heard of which are supported by any information he has come across by his own efforts rather than having it shouted at him by one of the warring factions or another. Both theories have been discarded, one of them officially disparaged and the other simply vanished as soon as it appeared and has never, ever, been mentioned since, by any of the parties to the case or any of the conspiracy theorists who have fed off the case for a quarter of a century. The two theories are not mutually exclusive either, but BOTH of them proving to be correct does open a Pandora’s box of motives based on Accelerationist ideology. There appears to have been a policy decision not to tell the general public about the Accelerationists, which is a pity because it would help the public to understand why, much more recently, Daniel Clarke, Nicolas Prosper and Axel Rudakubana (to name but three) did what they did. Either one of these theories could be found to be true without opening that Pandora’s box, so here goes:

 

“Some sort of link between Jill’s murder and the abduction and presumed murder of her fellow bright, cheerful blonde, blue-eyed TV News presenter Jodi Huisentruit in Iowa, in June 1995.”

This was one of the first ideas to be hurriedly discarded and we were told that there was no possible link, and in any case the two crimes were on different continents. (As if the airliner had never been invented, really. Medawar fully accepts the official Metropolitan Police version to be credible and true and now believes that he must have once walked to Abu Dhabi and back in a single weekend, and that he has swam to and from Guernsey and the IoM several times over the years.)

There is no link known to Medawar, other than that both broadcasters and journalists would have reported on the still-unsolved abduction and murder of a young mother from Iowa (where Jodi spent most of her career) near Bristol (the part of the world where Jill’s career began) just as Jill was transitioning from being a newspaper reporter to a news presenter on local radio and local television, also in South West England. It is hard to see how those investigating Jill’s murder were able to state, with such commanding authority, that there was no link, when those investigating Jodi’s death haven’t seen any evidence that enables them to rule out links between her abduction and other cases (and there seem to be quite a lot of these, in fact.)

“Jill confided in a close female colleague that a young female journalist she had mentored at the BBC, had moved to Florida and then to Texas, where she had fallen afoul of a group of well-connected orthopaedic surgeons over a badly botched operation on her hand. Ignoring threats of serious retribution if she want to law, Jill’s protegeé went ahead and filed a civil lawsuit (in Austin, as it turns out) and was rammed off the road as she drove to court to formally commence her claim, This hit and run collision put her in a coma, leaving Jill as the only person still expressing any interest in the case. The lawsuit was of course never formally opened.”

This was the first theory which Medawar ever saw in print (and it was the only theory (it's more of an observation in a way) he has ever seen about Jill’s murder which is both highly specific and totally coherent). Apparently triggered by the appearance of a senior male colleague of Jill’s on Newsnight on the day of Jill's murder, to state very firmly for the benefit of the police, public and especially BBC colleagues, that Jill’s death was not a professional killing, Jill’s female colleague, who seems to have been a lot closer to Jill than the male authority figure ever was, wrote a good and fairly detailed article which Medawar read in one of the broadsheets the weekend following the murder. Because it was so clear, coherent and specific, Medawar foolishly expect this to be the start of a lengthy investigation by both police and press and there would be much more to come. To his eternal regret, he managed not to keep the article, but it was probably the Times on the Saturday, or the Sunday Times. It might just have been the Telegraph but that’s doubtful, and there’s no way The Guardian or Observer would have given space to a BBC employee contradicting the BBC’s official line.

This theory was not officially discounted, debunked or acknowledged in any way. It simply vanished without trace and has never been mentioned since. Medawar knows nothing about the fate of the lady who wrote the article, but it is pretty clear that any BBC employee who doubts the guilt of Barry George is an unperson. Perhaps she, too, is in a coma and on life support somewhere?

Accelerationists

and why they hate and murder “Nazerenes” a hate-speech term for caring Christian young women who try to help victims of crime or malpractice:

Here is a link to an article on Wikipedia; let’s see how long that link lasts, shall we?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Nine_Angles

It is very strange that this group has never made the front pages, but although it apparently started in Staffordshire and The Fens, the youth wing "764" is based in Texas (see above) and there are a number of politicians in that state who seem to lean towards Acclerationism and O9A seem to have as much money as they actually need, which isn't true of many political movements funded solely from within the UK.

It would be nice to firmly believe, regardless of the two theories mentioned above, that the Accelerationists don't actually exist, but that would be flying in the face of the evidence. The Home Office does seem prepared to fly in the face of a lot of evidence at times.