tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-82990904767849761922024-03-10T02:46:52.553+00:00Medawar's CornflakesAbout the fundamental human right to curiosity and reason.
How everybody's most basic freedoms are threatened by extremists and their assorted "causes".
Also, seeks to reclaim science and the right to reason as a vital human freedom.Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.comBlogger186125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-31439982450195783432024-02-25T07:50:00.002+00:002024-02-26T18:17:21.376+00:00"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!<p style="text-align: justify;"> There has been a successful Federal prosecution for this crime, <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/kansascity/news/kansas-city-man-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-plus-15-years-for-leading-cyberstalking-conspiracy-that-resulted-in-murder" target="_blank">details now released by the FBI.</a> It is worth noting that this was effectively also a gangstalking case insofar as the primary defendant was found to have had help on the night when things progressed to the actual killing and, given the intensity of the stalking (and blackmail attempts) which preceded this, it's quite likely that he would have sought to share the workload before this.</p><p style="margin-left: 40px; text-align: justify;">(Note to police, FBI and NCA: if a victim is alleging offences that seem like an impossible amount of work for a single offender, you must give weight to the possibility of conspiracy and/or common purpose as well as that the victim is simply mistaken. The latter course will <b>only</b> reduce your workload and help your career <b>if </b>it is really true: if the victim turns out to be correct you've just blown away your career, reputation and pension. The safest course is to check for this kind of thing, because it's always going to be more common than suggested by official statistics (which are primarily designed to get your political bosses re-elected). <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">No mention is made of sentences for the two known accomplices, which may indicate either that they still face further local charges in Independence, Missouri, or that they felt the need to cut a deal with the Federal authorities. Had they been proved to have assisted with the cyber-stalking phase of the case, they could easily have faced the same penalty. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">This highlights the enormous risks being run by anyone playing even a minor role in stalking, gangstalking and cyber-stalking offences, because simply by doing what you are told by the sort of person likely to become head of such a gang, <b>you are making yourself legally responsible for the actions of someone not in their right mind!</b></p><p style="text-align: justify;">There's more than one Federal law these days that can be used to prosecute such cases, depending largely on whether or not the abuse of computer technology was involved (bugs, spyware, tracking devices, and tracking apps on the victim's phone all count and not very many stalking gangs fail to use at least one of those!) Even when it's all done by word of mouth, it's still a <a href="https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2011/02/americas-forgotten-anti-gangstalking.html" target="_blank">conspiracy to deny rights</a> and when that results in death (or kidnapping) the penalty can be life imprisonment or death, if the current administration is minded to permit the latter.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">In the United Kingdom there is no such thing as a Federal crime; just varying degrees of severity or public interest which might divert a case from Crown or Sheriff's court to the Old Bailey or the Court of Sessions. But there is a an over-arching principle that participants in a conspiracy share responsibility for what the conspiracy does and there is also a law of Common Purpose, which requires even participants in a spontaneous offence to share responsibility for its outcome. Beyond that, a gang member can be and often is, charged with "assisting an offender in..." whatever the crime was. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">The cosy feeling of security in being a gang member or going along with workplace bullying is a legal illusion, because by doing so you make yourself responsible for the final outcome of that activity, however dreadful that might be. And the dreadfulness of the outcome is determined by the most psychopathic or sociopathic personality within the gang, or workplace. Everyone accosted by a bully or participant in a feud of any kind, needs to ask themselves the simple question: "what's the worst thing this person might do?" before doing anything that might help them do it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: large;">There's probably at least a dozen followers in jail for every leader who managed to get himself jailed rather than letting someone else go to jail for him.</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: large;">Bob Dylan: "don't follow leaders, who rob the parking meters!"</span><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-27239701247306508392024-01-02T07:25:00.002+00:002024-01-02T07:25:34.852+00:00New Year's posts by Victims of Organized Crime in Central Texas<p style="text-align: justify;"> VOCCT has posted two blog articles for the new year, see:</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://vocct.blogspot.com/2024/">https://vocct.blogspot.com/2024/</a></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Her remarks about lies are important, because stalkers, organised or otherwise, tend to depend on lies above all other means of manipulation.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Recently in the UK, several police officers (including some of Chief Officer rank) have been exposed as rapists and paedophiles. All of them protected themselves with a web of lies. If you are a policeman and you start tripping over lies told to you by your colleagues, your duty to the public is to find out just what is not only hidden but also <i>enabled</i> by those lies. If the lies you are hearing might seem innocuous and even tolerable, what about the thing that is being enabled by those lies? Might not that thing be something no reasonable person could possibly accept? Perhaps it might be as well to <i>check on that</i> before potentially implicating yourself by turning a blind eye!<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">There are multiple scandals associated with the pandemic which readers have just survived and so many others didn't, but <b>all</b> of those scandals revolve around individuals for whom lying was, and still is, the first resort.</p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-49825873219615594612023-10-29T07:09:00.000+00:002023-10-29T07:09:38.542+00:00Multi-generational Stalkers and Baseless Grievances<p style="text-align: justify;"> All stalking campaigns start with and are sustained by one or more grievances. The Oxford Dictionary (1934 edition in this instance: waste not, want not) defines a grievance as "Real or fancied ground of complaint." The Oxford Academics of the 1930s chose those six words with great precision: a grievance is as likely to be imaginary or falsified as it is to be true. An understanding of this fact might allow a lot of apparently motiveless crimes to be solved: people hate, and harm, other people, not only for things which the other people never did, but for things that never even happened in the first place. And yet, the decisive question which policemen ask stalking victims is almost always "what have you done to make them do this to you?" This question tends to be decisive in getting an investigation dropped or, more usually, not started in the first place.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">If a stalking victim admits they do not know of any reason, then the police tend to drop the investigation there and then because it's clear to them that it's not happening. (Unless the victim is female and attractive, in which case they will assume it's sexually-based and it might not be.)<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">If the victim is inspired to make a guess, then the police <b><i>might</i></b> investigate on the basis of that guess until it's proved wrong, from which point on the victim is regarded as a delusional nuisance, never to be listened to again.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">With vocational stalkers (and "professional" ones, who do it on behalf of others for money do exist as this is less risky than hiring a killer) the victim will almost certainly have been fed disinformation which inspires them to not only put forward a false reason for the stalking, but also to completely misidentify the stalker(s).</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The same applies in murder cases, too: the only difference is that the victim isn't even able to argue with the police when they can't find any motive, or, by getting the motive wrong, identify the wrong suspect. You are <i>never</i> going to uncover a baseless grievance by a close and methodical study of the facts! (For the wrong person to actually get convicted of a murder, the jury only has to buy into the prosecution's concept of either the motive or some other aspect of what took place. Because, although in theory the accused is innocent until proven guilty, the absence of any alternative suspect is often taken as proof of guilt and it really, really should not be.)</p><p style="text-align: justify;">But there is a much more fundamental danger with baseless grievances: they do not go away with time. The baseless grievance cannot be settled or resolved: you cannot pay back that which you never stole, you cannot sincerely apologise for an insult or blasphemy which you never uttered. <u>And because no falsely-accused party can "admit the truth" of a baseless grievance, it never gets forgotten either!</u> The most effective form of propaganda is to manufacture synthetic grievances against your enemies: Mr Putin's justification of the Russian invasion of Ukraine was based on numerous baseless grievances, such as Ukraine's Jewish president being an antisemitic NAZI! And this is why there will <b>never</b> be a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia; because Ukraine is required by Russia to right a whole raft of wrongs which never happened. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Mr Andrew Bridgen MP has been totally cancelled and de-platformed for antisemitism because he quoted, verbatim, a report by academics at a Hebrew University. Everyone in Parliament now knows this to be the case, all but about twelve members of Parliament continue to ostracise and vilify Mr Bridgen despite knowing that their basis for doing so is false. Future generations may never know the truth because this generation of MPs and journalists simply won't admit it.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><b>And all of the above has been written simply to illustrate what happens within the families and social circles of stalkers, to make stalking multi-generational in many cases:</b></p><p style="text-align: justify;">When a baseless grievance is used to explain, and justify, what the adults in a family are doing to someone else, and they might well be doing something that goes beyond harassment into persecution and mental torture, children growing up with that grievance (and often seeing what their adult carers are capable of) end up with some very limited choices:</p><p style="text-align: justify;">They can challenge what is being done and the basis on which it is being done, in which case they will be bullied into submission or even killed.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">They can try to escape, but they may be pursued and brought back out of the need of those who have bought into the baseless grievance to preserve it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">They can fade into the background and go along with it all as much as they need to in order to avoid repercussions.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Or, and in most cases this is what happens: the baseless grievance will be constantly repeated and reiterated in order to lend it force and this has a brainwashing effect, not just on those who hear it, but on those who say it. Add to this the fact that there is no good outcome for anyone in such a family or social circle who appears to disbelieve the baseless grievance and <i>learning to believe</i> the false grievance isn't so much the path of least resistance as the only available path.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Furthermore, whatever the baseless grievance is, it might not be spoken outside of the family or social circle doing the stalking, so the victims (and all outsiders) will be left guessing. And the stalking will go on until either the victims, their descendants or even their entire ethnic group, is gone.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Organised and individual stalking are not crimes against humanity on the same scale or intensity as the ongoing genocide against the Uighurs or the historical genocides against the Armenians and the Jewish Holocaust, which was inspired by the Armenian genocide, but they arise out of and are sustained by the same mechanism: the baseless grievance. And in Rwanda, stalking on the grounds of both inflated and baseless grievances was deliberately used by agents of the French Government to prepare the population to commit actual genocide.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">(Interesting point: The French plan for the Rwandan genocide pretty much followed Haman's plot in the book of Esther in the Old Testament. And Haman had no substantial motive for his plot at all, really! The alleged but scarcely believable motive for the Rwandan genocide is that the Tutsis used English as their lingua franca. The motive for both Czarist and Bolshevik repression in Ukraine was that the Ukrainians had their own language. Same story in Kazakhstan and Finland, really.)<br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-53085836862785646362023-09-16T04:27:00.000+01:002023-09-16T04:27:38.371+01:00Substack article series of note:<p style="text-align: justify;"> This may interest anyone who suspects that organised stalking mainly serves to harness little psychopaths to the ambitions of bigger psychopaths:</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://spystack.substack.com/p/the-puppet-master-and-the-psychopath">https://spystack.substack.com/p/the-puppet-master-and-the-psychopath</a></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Canada is somewhat further down the road than the USA or the UK, but the destination is still a country run by people with dangerous mental disorders and no moral conscience, manipulated from a distance by even more deranged people who may or may not be in Beijing. It's no longer "democracy versus authoritarianism" but reason versus psychosis.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-82540814063080205192023-05-29T16:53:00.003+01:002023-05-29T16:57:59.408+01:00Official WHO Paper describing a "likely" link between mRNA Covid vaccines and Multiple Sclerosis censored some days after publication.<p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicqZk2CVWYsqxJj8CyZ5ZXvT1U4dxepQ6Nw5GK4z0HTIC0goL-BECR3gYCUgCsHSNY7t50CLAFUHxu3sAGq-3nAQLlnV_pYrT8XXbMxiPhKYKQnxYEZsBzmjbqtCR9znBFVbEaHG3Vkne0_l6bd3xTE6zwyeVJBHT38SnatOwN8_00psQeRMewevdPtw/s1680/WHO%20COVID-19%20Research%20Database%20MS.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1050" data-original-width="1680" height="250" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEicqZk2CVWYsqxJj8CyZ5ZXvT1U4dxepQ6Nw5GK4z0HTIC0goL-BECR3gYCUgCsHSNY7t50CLAFUHxu3sAGq-3nAQLlnV_pYrT8XXbMxiPhKYKQnxYEZsBzmjbqtCR9znBFVbEaHG3Vkne0_l6bd3xTE6zwyeVJBHT38SnatOwN8_00psQeRMewevdPtw/w400-h250/WHO%20COVID-19%20Research%20Database%20MS.png" width="400" /></a></div><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;">For the whole pandemic emergency (and it has recently been declared "over" by the World Health Organisation), Medawar has given out NO information at all on the pandemic, vaccines or anything else. He would NEVER tell ANYONE to refer to any source other than official WHO documents for their information.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The above screenshot is from just such a document, describing a "likely" link between COVID mRNA and possibly other "spike protein" COVID vaccines and Multiple Sclerosis. There now appear to be ongoing online efforts to suppress this official document and it isn't at all clear who is doing this, or on what authority, or for what reason. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">At the time of writing this post, the report was still available here:</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-2138820?lang=en" target="_blank">https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-2138820?lang=en<br /></a></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Given that an apparently important document that the WHO saw fit to publish globally is being censored on the orders of some unknown third party, it would perhaps be a sensible precaution on the part of the UK and other governments, NOT TO SIGN the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 unless and until it becomes clear who it is exercising the power of censorship over the WHO! Because the amendments hand more or less total power over to the WHO, including the power to decide what constitutes an emergency activating those powers, it is completely unacceptable for there to be a hidden hand capable of controlling the WHO as it exercises such extraordinary powers.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">UK residents may like to sign the following petition, which seeks a Parliamentary debate before such wide-ranging powers are signed over. This would seem to be reducing the formalities on what amounts to a new global treaty to a minimum, but it's probably better to have that bare minimum than no formalities or debate whatsoever:</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/635904" target="_blank">https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/635904</a></p><p style="text-align: justify;">When the number of signatures reaches or exceeds 100,000 the UK government has to allow a Parliamentary debate (in some form; there's a catch) whether it wants to or not. There's no possible harm in letting our sovereign Parliament debate the actions of a government that is supposed to be accountable to Parliament!</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Signatories might like to contact their MPs asking them to attend and even participate in the debate, should it occur. To avoid the risk of "censorship by an empty chamber."<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-82716991347374632082023-03-05T07:47:00.000+00:002023-03-05T07:47:52.675+00:00VOCT's response to Dr Michael R. Williams<p style="text-align: justify;">Here is a link to a post by Victims of Organized Crime in Central Texas, responding in a non-adversarial and non-contradictory way to an Op-Ed article " A Message to the People of Fredericksburg and Gillespie County" published in the Fredericksburg Standard Radio Post newspaper (in Texas) on the 22nd of February 2023:</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://vocct.blogspot.com/2023/03/response-to-dr-williams-more-complete.html">https://vocct.blogspot.com/2023/03/response-to-dr-williams-more-complete.html</a></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Medawar has not yet been able to find a link that will allow readers to link to Dr William's well-written and authoritative article about the decline in the fortunes of Hill Country Memorial Hospital, successful efforts led by himself to revive those fortunes to the point where the hospital was winning national awards -and the rapid and wilful resumption of decline as soon as he moved on. Medawar does have an annotated copy of the article as printed in the newspaper, which he will not publish for copyright reasons and for other legal reasons involving the annotations.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">A link would be welcome and if a reader posts one in a comment below (and it checks out as safe!) it will be promoted to the main body of this post. The only person who can properly give (or deny) permission for the article to be reproduced here is Dr Williams himself. He is invited to do this, and he may supply the text as he wants it to be. Although his article was intended, as the title suggests, primarily for those who use and depend on the Hill Country Memorial Hospital, VOCT's thesis is that the shenanigans he bears witness too is more long-standing and extensive than he thinks and has had international repercussions of a lethal nature. It might be in the interests of the people he served so well, to make his article available online somewhere, but it would be unfair to expect him to do this, or allow this, on VOCT's blog which might directly associate him with her views.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">see: </p><p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-to-contact-medawar.html">https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-to-contact-medawar.html</a><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">A link to the article a platform <i>under the control of Dr Williams</i> (Blogger is free) would be ideal. Even aside from VOCT's thesis, the story which Dr Williams tells resonates with that of many failing hospitals in many parts of the world. What is so helpful about his article, is that he shows not only that failure of a medical institution be reversed, but he also explains how he did it! That deserves a <b>much</b> wider audience.<br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-23124626377891022722022-02-20T12:00:00.000+00:002022-02-20T12:00:16.941+00:00Is "Gangstalking Australia" vindicated, more than twelve years later?<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://gangstalking-australia.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Gangstalking Australia</a> is (<a href="https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-to-contact-medawar.html" target="_blank">was?</a>) a talented mixed-race female artist and victim of very intense stalking and harassment, in Australia, who was in contact with Medawar up to 2010. Towards the end of her contact with Medawar, she was living on the road, in a van, in the Northern Territories, because her house had been made completely untenable by stalkers harassing her with both toxic chemicals and directed-energy weapons. One of the latter was definitely some kind of non-visible-wavelength laser which could scorch patterns on the net curtains and indeed the wallpaper of her house. Another energy weapon could penetrate clothing to inflict pain and cause blisters and other indications of burns. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Toxic chemical explanations are much less favoured by conspiracy theorists, for some reason, but were definitely being used against Gangstalking Australia, and her vomiting attacks are strongly suggestive of chloropicrin, which is officially recognised as a chemical weapon under international treaties intended to ban such things. Do not believe anyone who states that chloropicrin is non-lethal! It was used in the Great War in conjunction with more toxic gases such as Cyanide, Mustard and Phosgene, because it is very fast acting (faster than most modern nerve gases in fact) and by opening a gas barrage with some chloropicrin shells, enemy soldiers could be incapacitated before they could put on their gas masks, allowing them to be killed by the more obviously-lethal gases or even masked soldiers with bayonets, because they would be completely unable to defend themselves. Chloropicrin causes absolutely convulsive vomiting within a few seconds of exposure and it is by no means impossible or even unlikely for this to cause death by asphyxia by itself.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">During the same period that Gangstalking Australia was reporting these attacks via her blog, Medawar was in contact with several unconnected individuals in native North American communities who reported the same (and other) chemical attacks. Very few white American stalking victims reported chemical attacks by comparison, which may be why the "TI community" thinks it's all directed-energy stuff and to do with "satellites", but there were some white victims. Also in that period, some Sámi people (native Laplanders) reported similar abuse. Medawar suggested at the time that the objective of the harassment might be to destabilise (non-immigrant) ethnic minorities in preparation for some community-wide abuse; the native Americans thought that this was quite likely. Medawar didn't have enough contact with Sámi or native Australian victims to determine if the same might be true with them. The native American victims were journalists, community spokespeople and so on and so forth. Ideal targets for a destabilisation campaign in other words.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Directed-energy weapons which burn skin through clothing could be working either in the far infrared part of the spectrum or the adjacent millimetre-wave part of the electromagnetic spectrum. The point where these spectra meet is also where a laser becomes a maser, or possibly even just a planar-array antenna (a flat plate, in appearance). So there's a variety of forms such a weapon could take and still inflict the same kind of pain and injury in the same kind of way.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Which brings us up to the present day and reports that demonstrators in Australia have been attacked (and burned by) what look most likely to be planar-array millimetre wave antennae from the <a href="https://www.infowars.com/posts/microwave-energy-weapons-deployed-against-canberra-freedom-convoy/" target="_blank">published images of suspect equipment.</a><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">It could well be that what happened to Gangstalking Australia, the Native North American and Sámi victims a decade ago was some kind of experiment to test prototype weapons on people from marginalised communities (or people against whom individual testers had some kind of a personal grudge) in readiness for the day when officialdom might need to protect itself from the general public, that is, the electorate from whom the officials obtain the right to hold office!<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p><p style="text-align: left;"><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-61291549228040728752021-12-02T09:15:00.000+00:002021-12-02T09:15:36.802+00:00Nonces With Actual Power: a new acronym for the post-Epstein age<p style="text-align: justify;">There's a funny thing about all the witnesses to Jeffrey Epstein's life and work as a mentor of surprisingly young women entering the hospitality industry. That is, when pressed, they can bring themselves to remember Prince Andrew (a very slow-moving target with no actual power; during the Falklands War he flew a helicopter used as a decoy to protect more important targets from Exocet missiles) but they have <b><i>so much trouble</i></b> remembering former Israeli or British Prime Ministers enjoying Epstein's services that no-one is even pressing the issue. There's a similar memory problem with former US Presidents and, even more so, with the founder of one of the world's most powerful Tech companies. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Medawar thinks that the world needs a new acronym for those so important and influential as to slip the memory of every potential witness and complainant that they encounter.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">A NWAP, a Nonce With Actual Power also has magical powers which makes them invisible to witnesses and which erases their name from flight logs and passenger lists. Lesser politicians get mired in scandal and have their careers destroyed because of a small indiscretion such as doing paid work in their House of Commons office, but a NWAP can commit multiple felonies without their Teflon (TM) character being stained.<br /></p><p style="text-align: left;"><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-1136613765416330602021-10-12T11:46:00.000+01:002021-10-12T11:46:31.579+01:00How to Cope with Organised Stalking: an open letter to Chris Packham<p style="text-align: justify;"> It is apparent from the latest of several <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-58861252" target="_blank">news items</a> over the past few years, that the wildlife campaigner and broadcaster Chris Packham has fallen victim to what can only honestly be described as organised stalkers. This makes him an involuntary member of a club with very wide membership ranging from campaigners with views similar to his own, to those who are diametrically opposed and a rather larger number of people who have no idea at all why they are being persecuted. This post, while not comprehensive (or it would be far too long for anyone to read) sets out to offer some useful observations and tips for Mr Packham or anyone else, whatever their views on any matter, who finds themself in a similar position. </p><h4 style="text-align: left;">Don't be too concerned with discovering or speculating about your stalker's motives:</h4><p style="text-align: justify;">There are a few reasons for this advice. First and foremost, stalking and all other forms of targetted persecution are wrong, always wrong, and there is no cause, however urgent, however noble, which cannot disgrace and destroy itself by resorting to this kind of tactic. Recognising that stalking is always wrong and can never be justified is an important part of the solution, because it allows you to make common cause with those whom you might otherwise reject and bitterly oppose and it puts your persecutors on a collision course with the rest of the human race and, if you care to believe it, greater forces than that. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Secondly, Medawar once asked a psychiatrist why people were prepared to take part in stalking campaigns and the <b>immediate and unequivocal</b> response was "because they enjoy it." Everything Medawar has learned about stalking in the twenty years since that interview has supported that simple statement from the psychiatrist. Stalking doesn't just destroy the victim: it destroys those causes in whose name stalking is employed. Former members of the campaign group "Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty" believe they were defeated by a conspiracy between the government and "Big Pharma" but the harsh truth is that their methods, and the stalking of individuals and families in particular, turned pretty well the whole country against them and anyone who even sounded like them. There is no gain <i>for the cause</i> in the resort to stalking. Organised stalking, just like lone stalking, is done purely for the enjoyment of those organising it and those carrying it out. <i>Your beliefs and your causes only really matter to them because they matter to you, allowing them to gain sadistic pleasure from frustrating your campaigns and destroying your hopes.</i> Stalking is always about destroying hope in the end, because that's what gives a sadist the biggest thrill. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Consider, for a moment, that many victims of organised stalking have no history of activism at all; sometimes the trigger is amazingly trivial, almost always it involves the victim doing something he or she had a perfect right to do. Your beliefs, and the <i>apparent</i> beliefs of your persecutors, are usually <b>not</b> the real reason it is happening. There is nothing to be gained from compromising your beliefs, "toning them down" or doing anything other than regularly checking that <i>you </i>are happy in your own heart and mind with what you are doing. Artists are stalked, not usually to suppress any political message in their work, but because destroying their creativity gives the stalkers the thrill of cutting off a butterfly's wings, magnified a thousand times. The only satisfactory solution to stalking is to expose the stalkers and stop the stalking. Scuttling for cover is not only cowardly, but utterly futile.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">And this brings us to an important observation based on more than two decades experience of these matters:</p><h4 style="text-align: left;">Lies Are A Stalker's Most Powerful Weapon (and thereby the most addictive)</h4><p style="text-align: justify;">Sometimes, lies are all a stalking campaign consists of, but more often they are used to complement and enable all the threats, vandalism, cruelty to pets and recreational arson which constitute the more obvious threat. Stalkers will spread lies about the victim, often before they notice anything amiss, to distance and then slowly isolate them from friends, neighbours and even family members. Those lies will also lie there waiting for a police investigation to start, which will always involve discreet inquiries amongst the victim's friends, neighbours and relatives -and the planted lies will be designed to cancel or fatally misdirect the police investigation in pretty short order. This is the major reason why victims frequently end up believing that the police are complicit in their stalking: the stalkers have carefully laid "evidence" for the police to unearth, perhaps long before the stalking appeared to start and the first complaint to the police is filed.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">But because lies are so powerful and effective, stalkers come to depend on them and that can create a contradiction which suddenly collapses the house of cards. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Note to policemen reading this: if everyone around the victim believes something that he doesn't think is true, try tracing that belief back to its source. Lots of people believing the same (bizarre and/or defamatory?) thing is actually unnatural: threat this phenomena with due suspicion. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The stalkers will lie to the victim, in that almost every bit of physical evidence they leave behind for them to find will be misleading in some way. Look for a pattern behind the pattern: "What are they trying to make me think? Is it something designed to drive a wedge between me and the police, or somebody else that I depend on?"</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The stalkers will lie to campaigners and activists who might oppose the victim, in order to get them to help with the stalking. Perhaps without them ever realising how much has been happening and just how harmful it is.</p><h4 style="text-align: justify;">Stalking is unrequited murder<br /></h4><p style="text-align: justify;">Anything that speaks of a high, noble or political agenda behind the stalking is also a lie: noble aims do not need to be pursued by methods such as this. They are doing it because slowly destroying someone by stalking gives them a thrill akin to murder without the legal risks. There is a great danger for the whole of society in the police treating stalking and harassment as a trivial issue, not worthy of their precious resources, because the perception of risk is the only thing which separates the stalker from the murderer and current, dismissive, police attitudes are steadily eroding that risk.</p><h4 style="text-align: justify;">Try and count your persecutors (at least approximately) before you spend undue effort identifying them</h4><p style="text-align: justify;">You should keep a log of everything that happens throughout the staking and harassment in any case: the police advise this, even if they are disposed to ignore the results if it suits them. But enhance the data by always suffixing an estimate of the <i>minimum</i> number of persons required to do it. Also always suffix how far away you were from home when it happened. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Over time, those two metrics can be a very useful tool for identifying your persecutors and may one day give you peace of mind, if the right number of stalkers are brought to justice or at least exposed. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">A small number of stalkers operating mostly in your local area may imply that it's a couple of mates (or brothers) and that all their communication with each other is face to face or by direct phone call, so they don't need social media for any purpose except adding to the pressure on you. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">A large number, operating almost everywhere you go, implies a group or network with some form of <i>shared communication</i> which the authorities might be able to penetrate. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">And so on. Those two metrics will make your harassment log or diary more useful to the authorities, always assuming that they see the need to take genuine action. Which is constantly being demanded by successive Home Secretaries and ignored by successive Chief Police Officers.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-63651180466180897672021-08-13T14:20:00.006+01:002021-08-14T07:58:08.418+01:00It's Official: Mass Killer Jake Davison Was Not a Terrorist<div><p style="text-align: justify;"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB1qO6d6RJpqW5BbFCtNoPM9OODc5Sc-kHWcjqeLNKbMZOOg1GbLspyrHqRBkj-X_CehMWH1zSmrscPVRMSaNkTvnM3Y_r0U2N_orqOHQu2Ts0MgyAgE_5JL-HoSEtwtnfZcrs_QIKFzhj/s976/jake+davison.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="549" data-original-width="976" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiB1qO6d6RJpqW5BbFCtNoPM9OODc5Sc-kHWcjqeLNKbMZOOg1GbLspyrHqRBkj-X_CehMWH1zSmrscPVRMSaNkTvnM3Y_r0U2N_orqOHQu2Ts0MgyAgE_5JL-HoSEtwtnfZcrs_QIKFzhj/w426-h240/jake+davison.jpg" width="426" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Image from facebook via BBC<br /></td></tr></tbody></table><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify;"> Almost the first fact which emerged about the Plymouth mass killer, Jake Davison, was that he frequented "Incel" websites and was influenced by their ideology, which amounts to the promotion of armed struggle against the petty injustices of normal life. The first thing the government said about the incident was that it was "not terrorist-related."</div><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;"> This reminds Medawar, strongly, of the linguistic gymnastics employed by ministers of previous governments, senior police officers and the BBC to ensure that nobody ever described SHAC and other ALF-offshoots as "terrorists" even as firebombs were planted, graves robbed both in the UK and in Switzerland and organised attempts were made to use the threat and exercise of violence and arson to alter public policy. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">These days, even the IRA cannot be described as "terrorists" and to be labelled a terrorist a killer has to have frequented either Islamist websites or neo-nazi ones. Even there, <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-58191473" target="_blank">Danyal Hussein</a> is another "not terrorist" killer even though he frequented many of the same satanic and neo nazi websites as offenders who have been convicted as terrorists. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">In the case of the Incels, the omission is startling because readers of Incel webites and other material kill really quite often, especially on a global scale, and Medawar would be inclined to bet that far fewer people are seeking out and reading this material than is the case with Islamist propaganda. Proportionately more "Incelists" may be turning to murder than Islamists!<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">There are two reasons why people in powerful positions might want to classify a habitually violent campaign group as definitely not terrorists. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Reason number one is obvious, and obviously corrupt: ministers and officials are aware of wealthy and influential people who support the goals and objectives, if not (openly) the methods, of groups, such as the animal rights offshoot SHAC, which any normal person would see as terroristic. This kind of bias applies beyond terrorism to organised groups promoting other forms of illegality, such as the Paedophile Information Exchange, which once benefited from a publicly-funded grant to promote the acceptance and practice of child sexual abuse. Jimmy Saville had many highly-placed friends and so might have another prolific and weirdly unprosecuted child-molester, Thomas Hamilton. (The grant money was used by PIE to research the abusive habits of its own supporters, so that the organisation would know how best to cater for their needs. They even published the results, because the study was publicly-funded and at that time nobody in authority saw anything wrong with what was going on.)<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Reason number two is more insidious: officials intend to use media and public outrage at Incelist atrocities to justify oppressive measures directed against the general population. For that purpose, officials must pretend that the authors of the atrocities are inseparable from the general population and therefore they and Parliament are powerless to take action against the would-be culprits in any <i><b>selective</b></i> way! </p><p style="text-align: justify;">People who assume that this will only affect holders of firearms certificates may be in for a rude shock when they find themselves being asked to prove not only their identity but their state of mind when buying long-distance train tickets or gaining access to football stadiums. Thanks to the willingness of certain American Tech Companies to work hand in hand with the Chinese Communist Party to develop artificial intelligence applications for "public security" purposes, the technological tools now exist for a much more durable and intrusive elimination of personal freedom than that which caused so much outrage during the (temporary) pandemic lockdowns. There are people in Whitehall for whom the mere existence of such tools is a good enough reason to find excuses to employ them.</p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-22192434908510167052021-06-18T07:09:00.003+01:002021-06-18T07:09:49.575+01:00"Peeky-Lou" and how Forensic Psychologists can be Manipulated and Fooled Outright.<p style="text-align: justify;"> This is a <a href="https://vocct.blogspot.com/2021/06/peeky-lou.html">link</a> to a blogpost which raises the question of how well psychological "offender profiling" works when a killer has (or <i><b>uses</b></i>) multiple fantasy personas and kills different victims as different personas.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">Medawar knows who the blog author means and has experience of him blitzing blogs and forums with multiple comments as different people. His real self has useful political connections and these, and the multiplicity of personas that he uses, are very good at putting investigators off the scent. So there is an element of cold calculation behind the multiple personas and it's not exactly the <i><b>same </b></i>sort of mental disorder that it looks like at first: it's a deeply psychopathic but highly-educated mind using disorders that he has studied during his medical training and practice to advance a hobby of tormenting and periodically killing people. <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">The mind in question failed his psychiatric screening tests at medical school, but was allowed to sit them a second time, where he passed with flying colours with the benefit of appropriate study and paid-for coaching by former law enforcement officers with appropriate training. This is another way in which forensic psychologists can be duped: by offenders prepared to sit up late with the texts used to train forensic psychologists and, indeed, retired forensic psychologists with financial needs. <br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-53589466212443469952021-05-18T09:12:00.006+01:002021-05-18T16:56:59.648+01:00"Havana Syndrome" and Covert Reading of RFID secure access passes<p style="text-align: justify;">For five years now, the US Government has been trying to understand why diplomats, soldiers and indeed <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/17/politics/us-investigates-second-case-mystery-syndrome-white-house/index.html" target="_blank">White House officials</a> suddenly fall sick in particular locations. There has been speculation that the illness is the accidental effect of some kind of device intended to harvest data from cellphones or other mobile devices. However, those devices are all powered by batteries and do not need to be strongly energised by RF radiation (a plausible cause of the ill-effects) in order for data to be harvested.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">RFID cards and tags, however, do need to be energised by an RF signal in order for them to be read, and if the intent is to read them at a significant distance, they need to be strongly energised.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">In the past five years, "contactless" bank cards have become universal and these are RFID devices, and as far as Medawar knows, everyone of the suspected victims has a job requiring them to have an RFID pass of some kind to activate the security measures (which may also include biometrics once the process is triggered by the RFID device) which get them in and out of their place of work. Indeed, the two White House officials in recent reports were both in the process of gaining access to the White House site when they were struck down with a mystery illness. </p><p style="text-align: justify;">One has to ask whether or not the SVR (to pick a suspect not at all at random) has an interest in either gaining access to America's most secure sites and diplomatic premises or identifying and tracking those who enjoy such access? Some entities would not want to seriously harm people just to read their data, but Russian state entities have a history of not caring tuppence about hurting or even killing people in the course of their daily activities.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">When RFID access cards were first marketed in the eighties, the marketing suggested that they could work at fifty metres: this had a negative effect on user confidence so the advertised range was dialed down, and dialed down further once contactless RFID devices started to replace money and people made accidental payments for other people's bills. But all RFID devices can be read at a significant distance if strongly energised, via a directional aerial and the answering signal also read through a good directional aerial with a high-quality RF receiver attached.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"></p><h3 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: red;">Reading RFID devices is a prerequisite of cloning them!</span><br /></h3>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-11929476781980394332021-05-15T14:17:00.001+01:002021-05-15T14:17:27.959+01:00Let the Girls Speak<p style="text-align: justify;">Readers interested in serial killers and the issue of whether some members of a community might even protect and assist one, may also be interested in this blog article by <a href="https://vocct.blogspot.com/2021/05/let-girls-speak.html" target="_blank">"Victims of Organized Crime In Central Texas".</a><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-70646367181621552842021-03-25T06:39:00.002+00:002021-03-25T06:43:42.923+00:00How to Contact Medawar<p><span style="font-size: medium;"></span></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQomfFe7smiKpnNRXcgrfMYQit5eF53oQgmzkzIi9IoRgBu1TshpclTBm7SFaJ_Zog0RXZ0AtTgaHeesyYo_YQMT_cSHc1uK4FVOuBIKIICPwGDeawpdjQYQLLBmSVT1Lbi05bFaC8L7lN/s699/IpcressFile_197.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="297" data-original-width="699" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQomfFe7smiKpnNRXcgrfMYQit5eF53oQgmzkzIi9IoRgBu1TshpclTBm7SFaJ_Zog0RXZ0AtTgaHeesyYo_YQMT_cSHc1uK4FVOuBIKIICPwGDeawpdjQYQLLBmSVT1Lbi05bFaC8L7lN/s320/IpcressFile_197.jpg" width="320" /></a></span></div><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span><p></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: medium;">This procedure is only for things which are too important or too dangerous for the normal comments section. If you just want to vent, leave a normal comment.</span></p><p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;"> </p><p style="text-align: justify;">Firstly, if you don't already have a free Protonmail.com account, <a href="https://protonmail.com/signup" target="_blank">create one.</a></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Make sure you keep a note (just for yourself) of the address, log-in details etc! <br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Enable the advanced logging option, so that Protonmail.com will log the IP of anyone accessing your account. Other security settings are up to you, of course: do not use any which you cannot cope with, though. (Protonmail.com offers security options which only really work for highly-computer-literate people.) Check the log fairly regularly. If there's an IP which isn't yours, make a note of it and change your password.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Secondly, post a comment here on Medawar's Cornflakes, preferably starting with the words "secure communication, do not publish" and containing your new Protonmail.com email address. You should receive (may take a day or two and bear in mind that there might be a time-zone difference) a message from Medawar's Protonmail.com account (it's at its most secure when communicating between two accounts on the same platform) establishing communications. Once this has been done and messages have been exchanged, Medawar will delete your comment without it ever being published and without anyone without access to Medawar's accounts being able to see it. If you post a comment whilst logged in to Gmail, it can't be seen from that account unless Medawar publishes it, so this can get you out of a hole where someone snoops on your Gmail or whatever.<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Thirdly, send any suspect IPs that access your Protonmail account to Medawar, preferably with a note of when (say what time zone the time is in!) and how much damage may have been done. Be careful about sending screenshots, because they might contain information that is private to you.<br /></p><p style="text-align: left;"><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-43877610463929825672021-03-24T21:45:00.002+00:002021-03-24T21:45:51.706+00:00Organised Crime Boss Effectively Jails Himself by Stalking His Girlfriend<p> Just a quickie, that some readers of this channel might appreciate:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gangstersinc.ning.com/profiles/blogs/colombo-mafia-family-capo-who-stalked-his-girlfriend-pleads-guilt?xg_source=msg_mes_network" target="_blank">How to get yourself jailed.</a><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-30066901486845378032021-02-24T19:01:00.001+00:002021-02-25T05:33:37.018+00:00A Fresh look At The Death of Gareth Williams?<p style="text-align: justify;">Following <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-56158160" target="_blank">news</a> that the Metropolitan Police Service is vaguely considering whether or not to follow up fresh forensic evidence in the Gareth Williams case, Medawar has considered whether to edit and update his nine-year old post "Money, Global Power and Gareth Williams". However, there's nothing about that post which has been proved wrong (because official inquiries have never even strayed in the general direction of Medawar's suspicions) or which is out of date, really, except perhaps the life/death status of some of the senior former MPS, Shin Bet and Mossad officers discussed in Medawar's original posts.</p><p></p><p>So here is a <a href="https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2012/04/money-global-power-and-gareth-williams.html" target="_blank">link</a> to it!</p><p>And the links within the original post, are working as of 24/2/2021.</p><p>This <a href="https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2012/04/well-schooled-in-black-arts.html" target="_blank">post</a> is less important, but worth a quick look too.</p><p><span style="color: #cc0000;">The following was added to the post @5:30AM on 25/2/2021: </span><br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">Another of the tricks behind cover-ups and non-investigations, is to present the matter as a choice between two (or more) opposing theories, neither of which is true. In this case, Hamish Campbell, the former SIO in both the Gareth Williams and the Jill Dando cases, suggests that Gareth's death "was linked to his private life and not his work" with the implication being that it was all down to incredibly perverse sexual practices (which is another ploy for non-investigation.)<br /></p><p style="text-align: justify;">However, Gareth's "private life" largely consisted of more work, and this was true even before he joined the intelligence services. In the period 1996-2000 he was mainly gaming and hacking (in a competitive sort of way against other hackers), and this could actually have supplied him with information which made him more of a threat to powerful figures, "skilled in the black arts" than his later official work for the intelligence services would have done, because the latter was always subject to discipline and control from his superiors aimed at keeping him and the service out of danger.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-82872236561491790972020-07-15T08:08:00.003+01:002020-07-17T15:15:36.314+01:00How Can Organised Stalkers Afford to Do It?<div style="text-align: justify;">
The simple answer to a question which has perplexed victims and investigators of organised stalking for years is easily answered by the video below:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They can afford to stalk because they use someone else's money, and if you own shares in a big dotcom company, that money could well be yours!</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NacqQW-SC7I/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NacqQW-SC7I?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The video also leaves those psychiatrists and policemen who argue that organised stalking never actually happens and that all the victims are deluded, with no place to hide except behind their own wall of baseless denial. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, the conspiracy theorists who claim that the involvement of big corporations in organised stalking is proof of a massive super-conspiracy may also be missing the point: </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There was a conspiracy in this case, between a fairly high-ranking executive who instigated it all because he felt the victims had affronted him personally by criticising E-bay, and other employees who appear to have enjoyed being ordered to persecute the victims, but who probably had no easy choice but to comply with the executive in any case. The stalking was not company policy and it definitely was not in the interests of the company or the shareholders, who may yet lose substantial monies from this. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The explanation for this and probably <i>most</i> organised stalking that takes place in the world (no explanation ever covers <i>every</i> case!) is that the sort of sociopath who is moved to sadistically persecute and destroy innocent people for some perceived slight (which is rarely substantial), tends to seek positions of power that he can abuse. Just as paedophiles seek positions where they have control of children, such as in social services or residential education. In fact the mentalities are so similar that Medawar is confident that a fair proportion of the people directing organised stalking will also be paedophiles because that's the sort of personality that will be involved.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><i>And because it is so important to them to occupy a position of power, they incline to extreme reactions whenever they, in that prestigious position, encounter opposition, criticism, or just unwelcome facts.</i></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If the case in the video is what can happen when a sociopath has a position in an organisation with as little involvement in covert operations as E-Bay (it wasn't even the notorious Facebook or YouTube!) what do readers suppose might happen if the same sort of sociopath has a senior position in the police, or the FBI, or the CIA, or even your local hospital? Do the senior positions at the local Masonic Lodge actually go to the most upright and trustworthy men, which is what is supposed to happen, or to those driven to attain such positions by their own vanity, who are the ones most likely to turn the collective resources of the Lodge against those who, wittingly or unwittingly, prick their vanity? </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The other characteristic of organised stalking very clearly seen in this case is that the immediate reaction to possible discovery was not flight or denial, but a coordinated effort to frame other people for the crime.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One afterthought is this: given the reasoning laid out above, wouldn't it make a lot of sense if the Chinese Communist Party had been colonised by all the sociopaths in China? Officials being terrified of having to tell the truth, critics being suppressed with ridiculous levels of force, an institutionalised refusal to admit any fault or error whatsoever in any circumstances! Medawar has read a <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/923511" target="_blank">novel</a> which advances just this theory.</div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-37865620647195735322020-06-03T13:47:00.000+01:002020-06-03T13:47:00.363+01:00Learning the Wrong Lessons from the Murder of George Floyd<div style="text-align: justify;">
With regard to the murder of George Floyd: many people are determined to learn the wrong lessons.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Recently Medawar saw an answer on Quora which suggested, probably factually, that in a
single month at the beginning of this year, American police managed to
kill more people than British police had killed between 1900 and 2019. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Other answers had highlighted the apparent fear which American police had of American citizens and vice versa.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There
is no way that American police have been running up such a huge
body-count solely by killing black Americans who do not pose an imminent
threat to the police or anybody else. They have to be killing white,
brown and yellow Americans who do not pose an imminent threat to the
police or anybody else as well.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There is
something wrong, somewhere, in either the culture or training of
American law enforcement officers which biases them towards killing
people to a quite incredible extent compared to other countries. Whether
this is paranoia, arrogance or just a conditioned reflex arising out of
training procedures, or a combination of these, is unclear. But there
is something badly wrong in the way that American police and citizens are
reacting to each other and it is not solely about race. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If
anyone wants to make comparisons between America and Apartheid South
Africa, well: Medawar was in South Africa when J.W. Vorster was president and
America currently seems to be worse. In most provinces of South Africa, the right
of self-defence extends to shooting policemen invading property without a warrant,
and police tend to talk to you, loudly and generally from behind a brick
wall, before taking any action. Taking proper cover enables the police to
communicate without shooting someone out of panic. American police seem
to expose themselves to the "suspect" and confront them at gunpoint
whilst establishing threat rather than communication: this escalates
most situations very effectively.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When
Arab policemen suspected Medawar of being a burglar (he had a door open in a
factory unit and they had never seen him before) they were nervous, but
they came and talked, said they were concerned about the door, and
accepted Medawar's assurance that the door was open in the middle of the night to let members of their
own armed forces into the factory without being too visible and alarming
anyone. He would NEVER have been able to explain that one to American
law enforcement without getting thoroughly drilled through the head.
They would have given him no real opportunity to explain himself at the
scene. The act of explaining, by itself, is to a psyched-up American policeman a challenge and a threat.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Americans have the right to bear arms, but they are <i><b>MUCH</b></i> more likely to be shot by police than in almost any other
democratic country (Medawar's non-lethal interaction with the Arab police did
not even happen in an actual democracy), and in most cases there will be no
legal remedy and the officer responsible will stay out of jail and
generally keep his job. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The officer
charged with the murder of George Floyd reportedly did something (kneeling on the neck to restrain George for a prolonged period) that was more or
less guaranteed to kill him (this would count as murder under English
law without needing any proof of premeditated intent, because you can be
convicted of murder if, without a reasonable excuse, you perform an
action which any reasonable person would expect to cause death.) BUT IT
WAS SOMETHING THAT ALL OFFICERS IN HIS DEPARTMENT HAD BEEN TRAINED TO
DO. (Which will be why his colleagues did not stop him and why he may be acquitted when tried.) There is
something wrong with the whole premise and philosophy of the training
programme and the culture behind it. A sudden outbreak of anti-racism
will not cure this, because nearly as many people will go on being killed
by police on some non-racist trigger.<span style="color: #888888;"><br /></span></div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-13868788980312630372020-04-13T17:26:00.001+01:002020-04-13T18:41:48.447+01:00Trusting ChinaA very short post this.<br />
<b>Don't</b> trust communist China, and below is just a brief glimpse of why you shouldn't.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KQaNdTKQyLY/0.jpg" frameborder="0" height="266" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KQaNdTKQyLY?feature=player_embedded" width="320"></iframe></div>
<br />Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-60392359711335872352018-07-09T16:35:00.000+01:002018-07-09T16:35:10.363+01:00Repeating Grenfell All Over China: Why the BBC is missing the point about Chinese CFC11 production.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEeCyqJldk1cCPAzK4NsJt0urYumZPnSItcoynpaMJAF83mqOTKvTM7U_yfhiyoy5PY3A7s2Yl-q-wqK0PJsIXLoTQQRWQ6U9B5Y4PPvl0AIxILdNlATUUvnpgij1_3g2nJoVJJ1peChXW/s1600/Grenfell-Tower-2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="1200" height="186" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEeCyqJldk1cCPAzK4NsJt0urYumZPnSItcoynpaMJAF83mqOTKvTM7U_yfhiyoy5PY3A7s2Yl-q-wqK0PJsIXLoTQQRWQ6U9B5Y4PPvl0AIxILdNlATUUvnpgij1_3g2nJoVJJ1peChXW/s320/Grenfell-Tower-2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">NB: this image shows the Grenfell Tower as it was, burning in effective isolation by the standards of modern Chinese cities, where such towers are built in dense packs. See below.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl7ox4apim4QIsgxCC1yr6Np7iCEGTs4c22nUxBfvROy8Epljmh1J2AnXXnR6yYzbqKQqplLKle2XTEKnsSqnUFC27EES627HoH0Tbxtn8ku6WkHomx69YFdPQ1n1d5UWw2hYlcKDFIVAM/s1600/a45.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="493" data-original-width="740" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl7ox4apim4QIsgxCC1yr6Np7iCEGTs4c22nUxBfvROy8Epljmh1J2AnXXnR6yYzbqKQqplLKle2XTEKnsSqnUFC27EES627HoH0Tbxtn8ku6WkHomx69YFdPQ1n1d5UWw2hYlcKDFIVAM/s320/a45.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is a <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44738952" target="_blank">link</a> to a BBC article about continuing illegal production of CFC11 refrigerant and "foam blowing" gas in China and the implications of this for the infamous hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica. For anyone concerned about this issue, and really everybody should be, this is quite worrying enough. But there's another problem inherent to article, which no-one at the BBC seems able to see:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The <b>usage</b> of the CFC11s, illegally produced and used on a huge scale in China, as the report uncovers, is pretty well entirely to "blow" (that is, expand into a foam) polyurethane plastic used as insulation. Investigations after the Grenfell fire in London and the two fires at the "Torch" building in Dubai, have identified insulating cladding and internal panels incorporating plastic foam as just about the worst fire risk possible, and of all the plastics to use, polyurethane is the worst of the worst, because not only does it burn vigorously and persistently, the choking black smoke that it evolves when burning contains significant amounts of hydrogen cyanide gas, which, when inhaled, stops a person's blood from transporting oxygen around the body, which is a very efficient way of causing death.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The implication of so much CFC11s being used by the Chinese construction industry <u>that the natural healing of the ozone hole has all but stopped,</u> despite a worldwide ban on CFCs, is that nearly <b>every</b> residential property built in China's enormous residential property boom, incorporates highly flammable and grossly toxic CFC11-blown polyurethane foam. Grenfell-like tower blocks are being built, not by ones or twos, or even by the dozen, but with <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcyYyyaPz84" target="_blank">literally scores of identical towers</a> being built next to each other in high-density developments, duplicated on hundreds of sites across the country. The risk is not just of a fire spreading rapidly up and down a tower block, <u>but of it spreading from tower to tower across a forest of densely-packed towers in a metropolitan area.</u></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The last time any Western City matched the level of fire-risk inherent in this, was when practically the whole of London was burnt to the ground in September 1666. The saving grace in China is, bizarrely, that hardly any of the millions of homes represented by these tower blocks and other mass-built buildings, appear to be currently occupied. But that being so, there are so many foam-insulated buildings being built, stacked up next to each other, that there's a real possibility of a multi-building conflagration big enough to produce sufficient toxic smoke to poison the whole of one of the megacities which China's Communist Government wants to build, with up to a hundred million citizens in each. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This isn't going to be like the existing Chinese pollution problems, where everybody coughs a lot and has to wear filter masks. There will be copious <b>cyanide</b> in the smoke and people will die together in extreme numbers. Outside the megacity, the effect of such a fire would be like a nuclear winter without the nuclear war. The massive use of polyurethane foam in China is not just a Western Liberal environmental worry about the ozone layer: it's potentially very much worse than that.</div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-73084436709353273132018-03-15T18:44:00.001+00:002018-04-05T14:16:41.086+01:00An Inconvenient Death: New Book by Miles Goslet<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4vOSUaYWPK-IwzY1Q2aOnjcr5Bkrp3gsQ7bN-WbS3gwTx6-sBootSAW4TSZDDfld3d0LFRr2IvxWQ-novCeNlqdz6-4etuVRGn6vcILethiY5rnqL5HVEQr_tbkXW3Rinqjpxx5BLaQYX/s1600/David_Kelly_2000s.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="268" data-original-width="266" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4vOSUaYWPK-IwzY1Q2aOnjcr5Bkrp3gsQ7bN-WbS3gwTx6-sBootSAW4TSZDDfld3d0LFRr2IvxWQ-novCeNlqdz6-4etuVRGn6vcILethiY5rnqL5HVEQr_tbkXW3Rinqjpxx5BLaQYX/s400/David_Kelly_2000s.jpg" width="397" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHSwvJedasciDwUjWR0LpHOGXEK5zuorJXo3FIjNPhyiV74qJvY1KsCZslXSokCI6wRMcyujHTYJCSU9EmUCfCXfFliV3H8Nm8fVxdWQqCjxVKXgC25Gqo2sQGy91SzssV_GKfkGseCOQQ/s1600/_43058205_blaireu_300.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="300" data-original-width="203" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHSwvJedasciDwUjWR0LpHOGXEK5zuorJXo3FIjNPhyiV74qJvY1KsCZslXSokCI6wRMcyujHTYJCSU9EmUCfCXfFliV3H8Nm8fVxdWQqCjxVKXgC25Gqo2sQGy91SzssV_GKfkGseCOQQ/s400/_43058205_blaireu_300.jpg" width="270" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is a <a href="https://www.waterstones.com/book/an-inconvenient-death/miles-goslett/9781788543095" target="_blank">link</a> to a new book (available from the 5th of April onwards) about the death of Dr David Kelly and the surrounding circumstances. (Hardback price £16.99)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is published at a very appropriate moment, when Great Britain is learning afresh that we need the scientists and technicians of Porton Down far more than we need messianic pathological liars. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Kindle edition of the book may be ordered <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=an+inconvenient+death" target="_blank">here</a>. (Kindle Price £7.19)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Long before he was embroiled in controversy over Iraq, Dr Kelly was quietly exposing efforts by the Soviet state and post-Soviet Russian Federation to cheat on chemical and biological weapons limitation treaties (especially over the weaponisation of Smallpox), and that's never been more pertinent than it is today. It will be interesting to see whether the new book touches on this.</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv3eS03bUosUKQz4DNJqFwB6lAtmLGURL2JJSUhEGJLKauw32Uki8RnziVql77dkK1iNMEyz9r7-7djEAR_AdZKYgL6UDRJLY4di9_L9DDtyoh7AmTTeD1DKAowk1347KUot-Avk9Jm7Iv/s1600/putin-on-russias-meddling-in-the-us-election-i-dont-care-i-couldnt-care-less.jpg.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1039" data-original-width="1385" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv3eS03bUosUKQz4DNJqFwB6lAtmLGURL2JJSUhEGJLKauw32Uki8RnziVql77dkK1iNMEyz9r7-7djEAR_AdZKYgL6UDRJLY4di9_L9DDtyoh7AmTTeD1DKAowk1347KUot-Avk9Jm7Iv/s320/putin-on-russias-meddling-in-the-us-election-i-dont-care-i-couldnt-care-less.jpg.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-18301711203074037342018-01-11T07:41:00.001+00:002018-01-11T07:41:44.714+00:00Gaslighting Article<div style="text-align: justify;">
This is a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-42460315" target="_blank">link</a> to a feature article on the BBC website, which describes the stalking tactic of "gaslighting" from the stalker's point of view. It's not the complete story: the BBC isn't interested in the concept that whole groups of people get together to do this kind of thing, but it's a useful introduction to what is done, and it's proof positive that this kind of thing really happens and is not just in the minds of the victims.</div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-66680653735098574032017-12-18T13:59:00.001+00:002017-12-19T10:49:38.894+00:00Kill Books and Organised Stalking: a Spin-Off from the Bundy Case<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">This article is not about the Bundy case itself: it is about something <b><i>else</i></b>, not unrelated, of course, which is pointed up by some of the evidence which has emerged from independent investigations of the Bundy case. There are other respected bloggers who have specialised on this subject and Medawar doesn't intend to duplicate their hard work or get into pointless arguments: readers can go to them directly.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">That being said, anyone remotely interested in the Bundy case should view or read the source material referred to immediately below. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">This is a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxiXgBO4HHY" target="_blank">link</a> to a (slightly shakey, but bear with it) YouTube video of Washington State Representative Matt Shea reading from a document of "17-18" pages, which is based on an e-mail sent by Special Agent Larry Wooten to Andrew D. Goldsmith, Associate Deputy Attorney General. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">In it, (at roughly time index 13:00 onwards) Mr Shea recounts Special Agent Wooten's claims that Former Special Agent in Charge Dan Love had a "Kill Book": a sort of trophy, containing details of cases where Love proudly claimed to have caused three people in Utah to commit suicide.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">Here is a <a href="https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Larry-Wooten-Communication_77PI.pdf" target="_blank">link</a> to Mr Shea's source material, the communication from Special Agent Wooten. (It's a .pdf document). Medawar recommends that readers not only carefully read, but download this. (In this form the document is 16 pages, starting with page 2.) In the first paragraph on page 8 (according to the document's own numbering, page 7 as far as a .pdf reader is concerned), the "Kill Book" is mentioned.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">Medawar would like readers to note that this document is not uncritical of Cliven Bundy and <u>cannot fairly be represented as political propaganda in his cause,</u> or an endorsement of his actions, which Special Agent Wooten believes probably broke several laws and risked an armed engagement which might well have cost innocent lives. It is implicit in Wooten's view, that Mr Bundy stubbornly acted in a way which actually completely played into the hands of SAC Dan Love and others shown by the document to be highly prejudiced, biased and unprofessional. Special Agent Wooten also implies that, given the grotesque and at times almost unbelievable bias and misconduct within the BLM's Office of Law Enforcement and Security, that had Mr Bundy recognised the Federal Government and legal system and used them properly, he would have been in a very strong position, because his opponents had mishandled and concealed evidence at every turn -and apparently continue to do so.</span></div>
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<br />
<h3>
<span style="font-size: small;">What actually matters most here:</span></h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">The three people in Utah whom SAC Dan Love boasted of having driven to suicide, using (or misusing) his powers and position <u>and the indulgent tolerance of his superiors for misconduct on his part.</u> We know little about them, other than that Dan Love boasted of having caused their deaths in the course of his "work". There's no evidence for any of them being a confrontation artist who might be said to have engineered his own doom. They were US citizens, who for one reason or another came to the attention of Dan Love and the BLM, and they are <b>dead.</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">It is apparent from the context that Dan Love hounded these people in <b>precisely</b> the way that the "targeted individual" community has long claimed that gang-stalkers or "organised stalkers" do. In doing this, from within a Federal Law Enforcement agency, Dan Love must have engaged in a conspiracy with his colleagues, both supervisors and subordinates, to deny these individuals their constitutional, civil and other rights. This is a Federal Felony: "Denial of Rights" under <a href="http://trac.syr.edu/laws/18/18USC00241.html" target="_blank">USC 18 Section 241</a>. See also <a href="http://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/americas-forgotten-anti-gangstalking.html" target="_blank">the single-most read article on this blog</a>.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;"> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: large;">There should be a prompt and thorough criminal Federal investigation into Dan Love and his colleagues for <i>at least</i> three counts of this felony. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">If one has the sense and the detachment to put the Bundy case itself to one side, <i>for just a moment</i>, it can be seen that Larry Wooten's document is exactly the organised stalking smoking gun that skeptics (including many active stalkers) have constantly claimed that stalking victims cannot produce. It is very, very important.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">Readers who are still stalking skeptics should also read this <a href="http://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/taking-stalking-seriously.html" target="_blank">article</a>, and especially the update at the end giving details of two major official reports on failings on policing and prosecution of stalking cases in the UK. The reports, which are linked to, show numerous police forces and Crown Prosecutors effectively and wrongly adopting the positions and probably the arguments, too, of the skeptics, which, in Medawar's observation and experience, are largely (and generally unwittingly) informed by social media propaganda on the part of those taking part in stalking activity. That's before we even get into the issue of stalking being organised by law enforcement officers themselves, such as SAC Dan Love. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-size: small;">In the UK there is a term for low to middle-ranking officials abusing their power over ordinary people: "Little Hitler Syndrome". (High-ranking officials abusing their power is now generally known as "Blairism".) What Dan Love appears to have done is take Little Hitler Syndrome to its ultimate extreme. </span></div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-29460232335872845912017-11-01T12:08:00.000+00:002018-03-16T20:05:31.831+00:00"Peter Sweden", Hate Crimes and "British Police"<div style="text-align: justify;">
First point to make is that there is no such thing, yet, as "British police." There is such a thing as "Police Scotland" and also "The Police Service of Northern Ireland" but there is no police force for the whole UK, because the England and Welsh electorates wouldn't buy such an idea. The Scottish electorate is apparently beginning to regret doing so, as much local accountability (and operational efficiency) has been lost. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Guernsey Police, for example, are smaller than a typical English County Constabulary and this is so for all the Crown dependencies. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Europeans use the term "British Police" usually, but not always, in a derogatory way. They really need to specify what actual police force they are talking about, if anyone is to help them, perhaps by writing to the relevant Chief Constable and the <a href="http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/" target="_blank">Independent Police Complaints Commission.</a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anyway, in a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxE2D3ysdYg" target="_blank">recent video</a>, the You Tuber "Peter Sweden" states that, while he is in Norway, his family in the UK have been repeatedly harassed by "British Police" from the "Hate Crimes Unit" ostensibly seeking to protect him because of an intelligence tip off, but actually seeking to locate him on behalf of the Swedish government, so that he can be arrested and prevented from posting videos. Having reviewed Mr Sweden's work on You Tube, some of which has been demonetized (this happens, at the behest of an automated algorithm and apparently at random, to nearly everyone at times, so is no indicator of guilt), it is clear that he has not actually breached You Tube standards (his videos are still published), much less the criminal law. Certainly, none of his output would be seen as criminal by an English or Welsh court -and probably not in Scotland or Northern Ireland either. Some of the viewer comments on his videos are pro-Nazi, but this is an indicator of how widely neo-Nazi groups spread their comments rather than on the nature of Mr Sweden's videos. You see similar extreme remarks, probably from the same people, on most historical educational videos on You-Tube.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This means that the police, if he can identify which force he is talking about, and if they are acting as Mr Sweden says, are almost certainly acting in breach of the Constitutional Settlement of 1688, which some <b><i>European</i></b> laws may require them to do. This is an argument for proceeding with Brexit in a timely and concession-free manner so far as repressive EU attitudes to free speech are concerned.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The video of his that Medawar thinks has triggered these ham-fisted attempts at repression, is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GL2z_ykEtg" target="_blank">this one</a>. In it, Mr Sweden documents seven bomb attacks in Sweden in twelve days, of which the Swedish media and authorities have admitted only one. If the Swedish government was forced to admit to the true number of bomb attacks occurring in Sweden, which is more than for a fortnightly period in the UK at the height of the IRA mainland bombing campaign of the seventies, then the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office would have no option but to alter its official advice on traveling to Sweden, and they would have to advise Britons not to make any non-essential trips to Sweden. The EU would throw a tantrum if the FCO actually did this, so it's probably seen as more acceptable to extinguish Mr Sweden's right of free speech than admit to the truth, which appears to be that bomb and grenade attacks in Sweden are a part of everyday life and that the Swedish government has rendered itself powerless to deal with this, because it values image over substance.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
British readers should consider writing or e-mailing to their MP at the House of Commons, asking that Foreign and Commonwealth advice on the safety of travel to Sweden should be based on the number and frequency of bomb and grenade attacks that British intelligence knows to be actually happening in Sweden, rather than the much smaller number which the Swedish authorities are willing to admit to.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
See <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/contact-your-mp/contacting-your-mp/" target="_blank">link</a> for interactive list of contact details for local constituency MPs. This blog has a large number of American readers, too, and they might write to Senators or Congressmen asking that State Department advice on travel to Sweden should be based on intelligence estimates of the danger rather than by taking official Swedish statements purely at face value. Citing Mr Sweden's video about the seven bombs in twelve days as appropriate.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red;">Update 3/11/17</span> The wave of bombings continues, and Mr Sweden has posted another <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBgaSifZLNA" target="_blank">video</a>. One of these attacks, which he says was a "big firework" actually sounds like a big display shell in a confined space that did structural damage to the entrance area of an apartment block. He uses the British term "banger" but this normally means a small firecracker, incapable of the sort of damage that he describes. However, there clearly is an ongoing stream of attacks, using both improvised explosives and commercially-made military ones, such as grenades.<br />
<br />
This appears to be a "turf war" between rival gangs, and the Swedish government and media are unwilling to admit that this is what is happening. Police officers and their families are being targeted for gun attacks at their homes and even kidnaps, and still the Swedish government is trying to address the problem with jackbooted censorship and denial, rather than action against the bombers, shooters and kidnappers. As things stand, it seems more likely that a blogger or You Tuber such as Mr Sweden will go to jail for speaking out, than that an actual bomber will go to jail for destroying property and endangering life. <span style="background-color: yellow;">It definitely is <b>not</b> safe for foreigners to visit Sweden and do business there!</span></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: red;">Update 16/3/18</span> Mr Sweden hasn't said so in as many words, but Medawar believes that Mr Sweden's parents live in the North Yorkshire Police area. This is <b>not</b> a highly politicised force like the Metropolitan Police Service. He should try communicating with the Chief Constable instead of posting videos on You Tube: the police cannot react to the latter, they always respond to the former.</div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8299090476784976192.post-66652010106985105852017-08-04T07:47:00.000+01:002017-08-04T11:54:11.685+01:00Second Fire At The Torch Building in Dubai: Lessons Re Grenfell Tower<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLcXsnN5d-YPJzYZDSj30YWLknejJ-tDHOTev6B_tvhO-fK2MEuxGvzy8P2JEE8AHksdcHNKl7cMqAFWLev-aYssKkgEhh9DMk4fHRzphLQu7f7g084itypalsi0abQnVWy0LXQMqqgtnB/s1600/torch.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="571" data-original-width="242" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLcXsnN5d-YPJzYZDSj30YWLknejJ-tDHOTev6B_tvhO-fK2MEuxGvzy8P2JEE8AHksdcHNKl7cMqAFWLev-aYssKkgEhh9DMk4fHRzphLQu7f7g084itypalsi0abQnVWy0LXQMqqgtnB/s320/torch.jpg" width="135" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There has been a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-40822269" target="_blank">second fire</a> in the cladding of the "Torch" residential building in Dubai. The good news is that, once, again, staff and the the Dubai Civil Defence force was able to evacuate the building without loss of life.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Although it is clear that the exterior cladding material used on this building (as an afterthought to the original design) hopelessly compromises any fire-containment policy, it appears that the basic structure, layout and evacuation scheme for the building are all very sound: nobody was told to stay in their apartment for an hour or more during the fire, and the policy of evacuating residents immediately was carried out without compromising access to the building by fire crews. (Ie: the architect's access scheme is good enough to allow this.)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The second fire is proof that the cladding is a bad thing and should be removed from buildings <b>on a global basis</b>, and also proof that the policy adopted by the emergency services at Grenfell Tower, of keeping people in their flats, was heavily misguided and lacked all common sense, the product of a "public service" mentality which treats the public like sheep. There needs to be a criminal investigation into the conduct of the Metropolitan Police and the London Fire Brigade on the night: not all of the liability lies with the Borough Council, Property Management Company and the firms that peddled the death-trap cladding around the United Kingdom and far beyond!</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As regards all future buildings: the Torch building should be looked at carefully: not because it caught fire twice, but because everyone got out, <b>twice</b>, which implies that the evacuation policy expressed in the design is sound, and that what the emergency services did on the night, was sensible and sound.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Additionally, it seems that in two fires, fire and smoke from burning cladding <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4759064/High-rise-residential-block-Dubai-bursts-flames.html" target="_blank">didn't penetrate into the building and especially stairwells</a>, anything like as badly at the Torch as it did at Grenfell Tower, <u>and the most likely explanation is that the windows and especially window-frames, were better quality and more fire-resistant.</u></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Medawarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05119173935699236303noreply@blogger.com0